Why the cheapest option can be a step backwards for compliance, safety and service

Posted by
James Twigg

Date
10th June 2025

The cheapest option can be a step backwards for life safety & security

Lowest bidder rewards shortcuts, not safety

Everyone promises low prices. Everyone claims to hit the brief. But when safety, compliance and trust are on the line, is going with the lowest bidder always the smartest choice?

In every tender, there’s a temptation to focus on cost. The numbers are there, the comparisons are easy, and your procurement team can tick the right boxes. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: tenders don’t reward quality. They reward shortcuts – and shortcuts can be dangerous.

Too often, we see price treated as the deciding factor, when in fact it’s only a fragment of the value picture. Life safety systems aren’t stationery. They’re not a one-off. And they’re not just a job to be done and forgotten.

So yes, we’ll say it upfront: we’re not the cheapest. But here’s what we are: the team you’ll still be glad you chose in five years. The Difference Makers.

What tenders reward – and why it’s the wrong scoreboard

Competitive procurement often boils down to:

  • Price
  • Technical spec compliance
  • Sector experience
  • Response time
  • Capability to deliver

That’s all fine. But it’s table stakes.

Every credible provider has the right certifications. Every proposal ticks the boxes. Everyone promises responsiveness. It’s the minimum standard, not a meaningful differentiator.

When everything looks the same on paper, price becomes the only way to break the tie. And the cheapest offer wins.

But here’s what’s missing: What happens after you award the contract?

What really matters: partnership, continuity, and performance under pressure

Life safety and security isn’t just about installing a system. It’s about sustaining performance.

And that’s where the long-term cost of the cheapest bidder shows up:

  • Poor design leads to higher maintenance costs
  • Rushed or incomplete commissioning leaves critical risks untested
  • Lack of service support leads to unplanned downtime
  • Missed updates or audits create risks no one saw coming

Meanwhile, the contractor has moved on. Job done. Quote closed.

The better question to ask

Instead of “Who’s the cheapest?”, what if you asked:

  • Who’s going to be here when something breaks?
  • Who understands your growth plans – and designs for them?
  • Who will support your ESG goals, not just compliance?
  • Who will still be picking up the phone in year five, not just month one?

That’s where the value lives. In consistency. In continuity. In care.

And it’s what we build our whole approach around.

What partnership really looks like

Our best customers don’t just want an installer. They want a partner who:

  • Understands the pressures of their environment
  • Helps them get ahead of risks
  • Thinks proactively, not reactively
  • Works side-by-side with their teams

We’ve built relationships where that’s the norm – not the exception. And those partnerships aren’t just safer. They’re smarter. Because the real ROI in this industry comes from systems that perform, people who care, and risks that never materialise. These are the real difference makers.

So next time you’re writing the tender, ask yourself this: Are we buying a system? Or are we investing in peace of mind?

Want to see what a long-term partnership really delivers? Let’s talk.